Green check
Link copied to clipboard

Enhancing AI applications with RAG and computer vision

Learn how combining retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) with computer vision is helping AI systems interpret documents, visuals, and complex real-world content.

Using AI tools like ChatGPT or Gemini is quickly becoming a common way to find information. Whether you're drafting a message, summarizing a document, or answering a question, these tools often offer a faster, easier solution. 

But if you've used large language models (LLMs) a few times, you've likely noticed their limitations. When prompted with highly specific or time-sensitive queries, they can respond with incorrect answers, often confidently.

This happens because standalone LLMs rely solely on the data they were trained on. They don’t have access to the latest updates or specialized knowledge beyond that dataset. As a result, their answers can be outdated or inaccurate.

To help solve this, researchers have developed a method called retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). RAG enhances language models by enabling them to pull in fresh, relevant information from trusted sources when responding to queries.

In this article, we’ll explore how RAG works and how it enhances AI tools by retrieving relevant, up-to-date information. We’ll also look at how it works alongside computer vision, a field of artificial intelligence focused on interpreting visual data, to help systems understand not just text but also images, layouts, and visually complex documents.

Understanding retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)

When asking an AI chatbot a question, we generally expect more than just a response that sounds good. Ideally, a good answer should be clear, accurate, and genuinely helpful. To deliver that, the AI model needs more than language skills; it also needs access to the right information, especially for specific or time-sensitive topics.

RAG is a technique that helps bridge this gap. It puts together the language model’s ability to understand and generate text with the power to retrieve relevant information from external sources. Instead of relying solely on its training data, the model actively pulls in supporting content from trusted knowledge bases while forming its response.

Fig 1. Key RAG use cases. Image by author.

You can think of it like asking someone a question and having them consult a reliable reference before responding. Their answer is still in their own words, but it’s informed by the most relevant and up-to-date information.

This approach helps LLMs respond with answers that are more complete, accurate, and tailored to the user's query, making them far more reliable in real-world applications where accuracy truly matters.

A look at how RAG works

RAG enhances how a large language model responds by introducing two key steps: retrieval and generation. First, it retrieves relevant information from an external knowledge base. Then, it uses that information to generate a well-formed, context-aware response.

Let’s take a look at a simple example to see how this process works. Imagine you're using an AI assistant to manage your personal finances and want to check whether you stayed within your spending goal for the month.

The process starts when you ask the assistant a question like, "Did I stick to my budget this month?" Instead of relying only on what it learned during training, the system uses a retriever to search through your most recent financial records (things like bank statements or transaction summaries). It focuses on understanding the intent behind your question and gathers the most relevant information.

Once that information is retrieved, the language model takes over. It processes both your question and the data pulled from your records to generate a clear, helpful answer. Rather than listing raw details, the response summarizes your spending and gives you a direct, meaningful insight - such as confirming whether you met your goal and pointing out key spending areas.

This approach helps the LLM provide responses that are not only accurate but also grounded in your real, up-to-date information, making the experience far more useful than a model working only with static training data.

Fig 2. Understanding how RAG works.

The need for multimodal RAG systems

Typically, information isn’t always shared in plain text. From medical scans and diagrams to presentation slides and scanned documents, visuals often carry important details. Traditional LLMs, which are mainly built to read and understand text, can struggle with this kind of content.

However, RAG can be used alongside computer vision to bridge that gap. When the two are brought together, they form what's known as a multimodal RAG system - a setup that can handle both text and visuals, helping AI chatbots provide more accurate and complete answers.

At the core of this approach are vision-language models (VLMs), which are designed to process and reason over both types of input. In this setup, RAG retrieves the most relevant information from large data sources, while the VLM, enabled by computer vision, interprets images, layouts, and diagrams.

This is especially useful for real-world documents, like scanned forms, medical reports, or presentation slides, where vital details may be found in both the text and the visuals. For example, when analyzing a document that includes images alongside tables and paragraphs, a multimodal system can extract visual elements, generate a summary of what they show, and combine that with the surrounding text to deliver a more complete and helpful response.

Fig 3. Multimodal RAG uses images and text to provide better answers.

Applications of RAG for visual data 

Now that we’ve discussed what RAG is and how it works with computer vision, let’s look at some real-world examples and research projects that showcase how this approach is being used.

Understanding visual documents with VisRAG

Let’s say you’re trying to extract insights from a financial report or a scanned legal document. These types of files often include not just text, but also tables, charts, and layouts that help explain the information. A straightforward language model might overlook or misinterpret these visual elements, leading to incomplete or inaccurate responses.

VisRAG was created by researchers to address this challenge. It’s a VLM-based RAG pipeline that treats each page as an image rather than processing only the text. This allows the system to understand both the content and its visual structure. As a result, it can find the most relevant parts and give answers that are clearer, more accurate, and based on the full context of the document.

Fig 4. VisRAG can read documents as images to capture textual content and the layout.

Visual question answering with RAG

Visual question answering (VQA) is a task where an AI system answers questions about images. Many existing VQA systems focus on answering questions about a single document without needing to search for additional information - this is known as a closed setting.

VDocRAG is a RAG framework that takes a more realistic approach. It integrates VQA with the ability to retrieve relevant documents first. This is useful in real-world situations where a user’s question might apply to one of many documents, and the system needs to find the right one before answering. To do this, VDocRAG uses VLMs to analyze documents as images, preserving both their text and visual structure.

This makes VDocRAG especially impactful in applications like enterprise search, document automation, and customer support. It can help teams quickly extract answers from complex, visually formatted documents, like manuals or policy files, where understanding the layout is just as important as reading the words.

Fig 5. The difference between VDocRAG and LLM-based solutions.

Improving image captioning with RAG

Image captioning involves generating a written description of what's happening in an image. It's used in a variety of applications - from making online content more accessible to powering image search, and supporting content moderation and recommendation systems.

However, generating accurate captions isn’t always easy for AI models. It’s especially difficult when the image shows something different from what the model was trained on. Many captioning systems rely heavily on training data, so when faced with unfamiliar scenes, their captions can come out vague or inaccurate.

To tackle this, researchers developed Re-ViLM, a method that brings retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) into image captioning. Instead of generating a caption from scratch, Re-ViLM retrieves similar image-text pairs from a database and uses them to guide the caption output. 

This retrieval-based approach helps the model ground its descriptions in relevant examples, improving both accuracy and fluency. Early results show that Re-ViLM generates more natural, context-aware captions by using real examples, helping reduce vague or inaccurate descriptions.

Fig 6. Re-ViLM improves image captions by retrieving visual-text examples.

Pros and cons of using RAG to understand visual data

Here’s a quick look at the benefits of applying retrieval-augmented generation techniques to retrieve and use visual information: 

  • Enhanced summarization capabilities: Summaries can incorporate insights from visuals (like chart trends or infographic elements), not just text.
  • More robust search and retrieval: Retrieval steps can identify relevant visual pages even when keywords aren't present in the text, using image-based understanding.
  • Support for scanned, handwritten, or image-based documents: RAG pipelines enabled by VLMs can process content that would be unreadable to text-only models.

Despite these benefits, there are still a few limitations to keep in mind when using RAG to work with visual data. Here are a few of the main ones:

  • High computing requirements: Analyzing both images and text uses more memory and processing power, which can slow down performance or increase costs.
  • Data privacy and security concerns: Visual documents, especially in sectors like healthcare or finance, may contain sensitive information that complicates retrieval and processing workflows.
  • Longer inference times: Because visual processing adds complexity, generating responses can take more time compared to text-only systems.

Key takeaways

Retrieval-augmented generation is improving how large language models answer questions by allowing them to fetch relevant, up-to-date information from external sources. When paired with computer vision, these systems can process not just text but also visual content, such as charts, tables, images, and scanned documents, leading to more accurate and well-rounded responses.

This approach makes LLMs better suited for real-world tasks that involve complex documents. By bringing together retrieval and visual understanding, these models can interpret diverse formats more effectively and provide insights that are more useful in practical, everyday contexts.

Join our growing community! Explore our GitHub repository to dive deeper into AI. Ready to start your own computer vision projects? Check out our licensing options. Discover more about AI in healthcare and computer vision in retail on our solutions pages!

LinkedIn logoTwitter logoFacebook logoCopy-link symbol

Read more in this category

Let’s build the future
of AI together!

Begin your journey with the future of machine learning